One evening after attending the theatre, two gentlemen

were walking

down the avenue when they observed a rather well

dressed and attractive

lady walking just ahead of them. One of the men

turned to the other and

remarked, "I'd give $50.00 to spend the night with

this woman." To their surprise the young lady

overheard the remark and turning around she

said, "I'll take you up on that." She had a pleasant

voice and a neat appearance, so, after bidding his

companion good night, the man accompanied the lady to

her apartment, where they immediately went to

her apartment where they immediately went to bed.

The following morning the man presented her with

$25.00. As he prepared to leave she demanded the rest

of the money stating "If you don't give me the money

I'll sue you for it."

He laughed saying "I'd like to see you get it on

these grounds."

The next day he was surprised when he received a

summons ordering his presence in court as defendant in

a law suit. He hurried to his lawyer and explained the

details of the case. His lawyer said: "She

can't possibly get a judgement against you on such

grounds, but it will be interesting to see how her

case will be presented."

In court after the usual preliminaries, the lady's

lawyer addressed the court as follows: "Your Honour,

my client, this lady here, is the owner of a piece of

property, a garden spot surrounded by a profuse growth

of shrubbery, property she agreed to rent to the

defendant for a specific length of time for the sum of

$50.00. The defendant took possession of

the property, used it extensively for the purpose for

which it was rented, but upon evacuating the premises

he paid only $25.00 which is only half the amount

agreed upon. The rent was not excessive, since it

is restricted property, and we ask judgement to be

granted against the defendant to assure payment of the

balance."

The defendant's lawyer was impressed and amused at

the way the opponent had presented the case. His

defense, therefore, was somewhat altered from the way

he originally planned to present it.

"Your Honour, my client agrees that the young lady has

a fine piece of property, that he did rent such

property for a time and a degree of pleasure was

derived from the transaction. However, my client found

a well on the property, around which he placed his

stones, sunk a shaft and erected a pump, all

labour being performed personally by him. We claim

these improvements to the property adequately

compensated for rental of said property. We

therefore, ask judgement be not granted."

The young lady's lawyer come back was this: "Your

Honour: My client agrees that the defendant did find a

well on her property and that he did make

improvements such as my opponent has described.

However, had the defendant not known the well existed,

he would never have rented the

property, also, upon evacuating the premises, the

defendant removed the stones, pulled out the shaft and

took the pump with him. In doing so, he not only

dragged the equipment through the shrubbery, but left

the hole much larger than it was prior to his

occupancy, making it easily accessible to little

children. We therefore, ask that judgement be

granted."

She got judgement.

Do you own such communication skill? if not, keep

improving.

__________________

sOme ppL r aLiVe juS caUsE iTs iLLegaL 2 kiLL eM !!

impressive man! and funny! nice one!

__________________

gr8 u got it lol many ppl don even read it 1ce they c how big it is

__________________

sOme ppL r aLiVe juS caUsE iTs iLLegaL 2 kiLL eM !!

Well I do take time to read everything because this forum is like a home to me a i like to look everything through and through...

__________________